Bitcoin vs. Gold: Will October’s near-zero correlation shatter the “digital gold” myth?

6 Min Read
6 Min Read

Bitcoin and gold have told two different stories so far in October, neither of which matched traders’ expectations.

For most of October, Bitcoin and gold appeared to exist in separate markets. Gold has been steadily rising, gaining about 10% in the last month, while Bitcoin has fallen about 6%.

While this discrepancy is interesting in itself, the timing is even more important because the story people think they saw is not what actually happened.

Bitcoin gold performance 30 days
Graph showing 30-day performance of Bitcoin and gold as of October 22, 2025 (Source: TradingView)

What is often said is that Bitcoin has rallied while gold has been dumped, a reversal of the classic “risk-on vs. flight-to-safety” scenario. However, the data does not line up that way. Gold’s major decline did not occur until October 21st and October 22nd, when it fell more than 5% in 24 hours.

Bitcoin did not rise sharply in that slump, falling about 1.5% in the same period. Bitcoin actually recovered from its weekend losses the day before, when gold was still rising.

That order flips the correlation story. Instead of Bitcoin rising as investors traded in the metal, the two assets moved in sync for much of October 20th and October 21st. The subsequent fall in gold was an isolated metal move and a complete break from Bitcoin’s timeline, not a reverse trade.

However, Bitcoin experienced a brief rally towards the end of October 21, rising 5% to $114,000 while gold continued to sell off. Unfortunately, this rally was short-lived and Bitcoin returned to $108,000 within 12 hours as gold continued its decline.

Bitcoin vs. Gold (Source: TradingView)

This is important for those who still treat Bitcoin and gold as opposite ends of the same inflation hedge.

Last month, gold reacted to rate and liquidity and Bitcoin reacted to positioning and leverage, acting like two different species. Looking under the hood, on-chain data and derivative flows show that Bitcoin had already reached a near-term trouble point by mid-October, at which point it briefly fell 17% from its local highs.

See also  Bitcoin $1 million by 2026? It's not good news you think

The pain in gold prices came five days after traders began shedding positions built during earlier gains.

This lag explains why the correlation index for the month barely registers, reaching just 0.1 between Bitcoin and gold. A low correlation indicates a temporal discrepancy. That is, assets reacted to discrete shocks at intervals of several business days.

Structurally, nothing is broken in Gold’s cryptographic proxy either. Bybit XAUTUSDT perpetual, 24/7 gold contract priced in USDT has tracked the real world spot price almost perfectly. There was no meaningful basis drift, cash pressure, or liquidity gap.

The move was about the entire gold market taking a breather after a relentless rally. This rigorous tracking also shows how tokenized commodity exposure has become seamlessly traded within crypto rails.

If you are managing collateral or hedges within the ecosystem, these experts provide coverage around the clock, without dragging down futures expiry cycles.

Graph showing the performance of the XAUUSDT perpetual contract from September 23, 2025 to October 22, 2025 (Source: TradingView)

Bitcoin, on the other hand, did what you would expect from a more volatile asset. That is, it moved faster, hit lows earlier, and found its footing while gold was still at its peak. By the time gold broke, Bitcoin had already tested that support and stabilized above six digits. The beta value for gold (how much it moves when gold moves) is about 0.15, meaning it’s almost unrelated.

That’s what makes the divergence interesting. Although there is a lot of talk about “digital gold,” the two assets are often running on different clocks. Gold trades in macro time and reacts to central bank movements and liquidity pulses.

See also  Sharplink overtakes the Ethereum Foundation and becomes the largest ETH holder

Bitcoin trades on position time, with leverage, ETF flows, and on-chain circulation increasing short-term volatility. Crossover moments, where both parties respond to the same liquidity impulse, are rarer than most investors assume.

What we’ve seen this month is a reminder that correlation depends on the lens you use. After a day, they may appear unattached. A quarter later, the shared inflation narrative could be reasserted. But October’s split shows how easily that narrative can become fragmented when one asset is driven by traditional funding markets and the other by crypto-native leverage.

Is it the cleanest read? Bitcoin crashed first, followed by gold. The links were in chronological order. And in a market where traders are still looking for macro symmetry, simply noticing when two assets no longer share the same clock may be the wisest strategy.

Share This Article
Leave a comment