Ethereum’s fall to $2,000 has cost investors in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) more than $5 billion, extending the market-wide decline in cryptocurrencies that has also affected Bitcoin.
According to crypto slate The move follows a broader wave of risk-off that has pushed global crypto market values down $2 trillion from their October peak, with both BTC and ETH under pressure as volatility spreads to other risky assets, including tech stocks, according to the data.
The difference with Ethereum is that it has an increased percentage of exposure within a product built for traditional portfolios, performance is marked daily, and sales can be executed as quickly as any other exchange-traded security.
Quantifying losses for Ethereum ETF holders
Over the past week, Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seifert has argued that the typical U.S. spot Ethereum ETF holder is in a weaker position than Bitcoin ETF buyers.
In a post to
Applying this drawdown to the remaining net inflows of approximately $12 billion results in a paper loss of approximately $5.3 billion.
This size reflects the concentration of exposure in the ETF era.
Capital is raised when prices rise, and that collective performance is now recorded in a daily marked medium that is kept in a brokerage account alongside stocks and other liquidity risk exposures.
Seifert’s framework also highlights Bitcoin’s relative gap with its ETF cohort.
He said Ethereum ETF holders are in a worse position than Bitcoin holders based on the difference between the current Ether price and the group’s estimated average entry price.
ETF flows show holders holding on to status quo despite broader fund data turning negative
According to Seifert, the recent leg decline forced ETH ETF investors to draw down more than 60% at the recent lows, which is roughly comparable to the decline experienced by Ethereum near its April 2025 lows.
BitMine Chairman Tom Lee emphasized that Ethereum frequently experiences declines of this magnitude.
He said that since 2018, ETH has experienced drawdowns of less than 60% seven times in eight years. He explained that this pattern occurs almost every year, and even pointed to 2025, when ETH fell 64%.
This record does nothing to soften the current losses. However, today’s price action falls within the recurring pattern of sharp drawdowns followed by periods of recovery that have characterized ETH’s market history.
A central question in the ETF era is whether a broader group of holders, including investors who prefer regulated securities products, will react to these fluctuations in the same way as in previous cycles.
Daily flow data has become the most direct tool for measuring that behavior.
On February 11, the US Spot Ethereum ETF recorded net outflows of $129.1 million, led by large outflows from Fidelity’s FETH and BlackRock’s ETHA. The previous day, February 10, the complex recorded net inflows of $13.8 million from the same dataset.
This reversal highlighted uneven positioning, with capital moving in both directions rather than ending in a single wave.
The broader flow picture shows cohorts that have not yet been fully unwound.
Seifert’s estimate that net inflows have fallen from about $15 billion to less than $12 billion suggests meaningful redemptions, but not a significant setback compared to the price decline from the $3,500 area toward $2,000.
ETFs compress decision making, so relative stickiness is important. Investors do not need to move or relocate their coins.
Exposures can be reduced in the same way as equity positions are reduced, and advisors can perform rebalancing within their standard portfolio process. In risk-off markets, that convenience can fuel selling. It can also support the holding behavior of investors who are prepared to absorb volatility.
Breakeven point near $3,500 could shape market structure for next cycle
If Seyffart’s estimates are approximately accurate, approximately $3,500 would serve as a rough break-even point for the average Ethereum ETF holder.
If you return to that level during recovery, the focus may shift from loss to repair. For investors who have established exposure through a regulated wrapper, approaching breakeven can impact whether the allocation is increased, maintained, or reduced.
However, this level could also create selling pressure. Investors who endure a drawdown of up to $2,000 may choose to exit once they have recovered their initial capital.
Such selling is driven by portfolio constraints rather than technical analysis, and ETFs exacerbate this behavior by concentrating buyers within a range of similar cost bases.
That is, two paths can define the next phase.
One is macro stabilization, as risk appetite improves and ETFs move from uneven outflows to new inflows, which could amplify upside as wrappers are more liquid and accessible.
Alternative scenarios include a retest of the $1,800 zone with negative flows, making resolution of the remaining cohorts difficult.
For ETF holders, the short-term issue is more operational than predictive. If ETH rises toward breakeven, how will the herd behave? Will that level attract new demand, or will it be a point where selling accelerates?