The debate between Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knot continues. In this new episode, the aspects faced raise the level of discussion into an unpleasant area.
The “anti-spam” block, made up of developers and maximalists such as Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Mechanic and Matt Kratter, speculates that Bitcoin Core Version 30, which will be released in October, will bring serious network problems. In particular, Clutter is actively speculating that Core updates, or at least take action. “Status” of the unfolding of toxic garbage in Bitcoin.
Following the Bitcoin mechanic who first proposed the idea, Kratter insists in a video summarizing the location of the anti-spam blocks that Core V30 promotes the use of Bitcoin as a repository of illegal content. Especially like a warehouse It can house child pornography (PI) as evidence of criminal conduct.
This obviously crazy result would be the result of the “waterfall effect” caused by developers who adopted the Bitcoin protocol. Specifically, Kratter believes that you change the limits on Op_return.
As reported by Cryptonoticias, the Bitcoin Core V30 raises its limit to 100,000 bytes. Register any data (image, audio, text) in blocks of the network.
This fixes the “monetary essence” of Bitcoin, opening up more space to the block for non-monatary uses. Potentially, Bitcoin could become a more complex database. As it is a distributed and distributed system, there is no way to reverse/reject transactions (and their inscriptions) that are already contained in a block.
Bitcoin registration saved the possibility of it being impossible to suffer from a mass attack (very unlikely) reorganization. You cannot delete any of the history entries in that registry.
Thanks to this immutability, if someone registers porn in the transaction’s op_return field and is included and confirmed within the block, There is no way to eliminate that content. A node is forced to send a transaction and its inscription, which in some cases could have legal consequences.
On the other hand, 100,000 bytes is a lot of data. What do you do if these data contain sensitive information, state secrets, highly classified information, and other information that is illegal to own?
Matthew Qatar, Maximiaristo de Bitcoin.
So far, I have not speculated or thought of the Kratter exhibition. It speaks of a plausible event. This is because there is no technical reason why you cannot irreversibly register illegal content with Bitcoin.
So what happens when Bitcoiners start running the latest version of Bitcoin Core (V30) that sends this toxic garbage to each node to open OP_RETURN and strength filters? Each node corridor is immediately found guilty. (…).
Matthew Qatar, Maximiaristo de Bitcoin.
Speculative, ambitious, and less important, part two of that argument argues that the increase in the OP_return field in the Bitcoin block is an attack on the node by the state police. The same thing that secretly coordinates it to criminalize the network and its participants.
Each of the aforementioned bitcoiners protects against the use of bitcoin knots. Bitcoin Knot is a client that uses the OP_RETURN filter by default of 40 bytes that is not sufficient to register one frame. Copilot, Microsoft’s AI, refers to 40 bytes only have empty files with 40 flat text characters or minimal structures.
A typical image in Ultracompact format (such as JPEG) may require at least several hundred storage bytes. Bitcoin video is not possible.
Therefore, this 40-byte limits and meets the mission of helping to “save” Bitcoin’s financial capabilities.
The numbers supporting relaxation of the Bitcoin Core and Op_return filters gave an opinion on the knot maximalist ideas. None of them deny that Bitcoin can accommodate illegal content with Bitcoin Core V30. This is because I think the second represents a form of censorship.
That said, almost every supporter of the Core V30 believes that illegal content is a knot-tied FUD campaign.
Jameson Lopp, for example, does not believe that the High Op_return limit can kill Bitcoin. To support your denial, He quotes the Bitcoin SV case Spin-off de bitcoin cash It was created by Craig Wright, also known as Faketoshi.
An elaborate narrative (FUD) of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) by non-technical rhetoricists such as Bitcoin mechanics make naive mistakes such as forgetting to validate what other networks allow. If 100 kb OP_RETURN kills BTC, how did BSV survive five years with 1 GB OP_RETURN? Feel free to kill BSV to show your statement!
Jameson Race, De Sarora Doll Debitcoin.
According to Lopp, flexible restrictions won’t kill Bitcoin.
For Francis Priott, the irreversibility of registering illegal content with Bitcoin does not imply accusation of the network. There is a subsequent line of defense that can attract miners and mining pools for this type of content. Developers consider the trackable nature of its Bitcoin You will be able to pool as a Mara Banar user who sends illegal content.
If you send something truly offensive as a torrent link to PI (or PI’s JPEG) or Mein Kampf (illegal in many countries), Mara couldn’t plausibly deny that he was publishing and distributing illegal content. It’s in op_return, as everyone sees it. As a result, they probably won’t allow it. If so, they’ll get into trouble. And it’s much easier for content senders to be trapped. If non-standard nodes of nodes (i.e., free relays) begin to be abused by pedophiles, it is possible that their mining groups simply prohibit peers of this type of greater risk.
Francis Priott, developer of Bitcoin.
As a result, Pouliot makes predictions. Mining pools have no choice but to develop software to analyze the OP_Return field in transactions and evaluate whether to publish it. These pools You can develop content moderation policiesThe illegality of OP_Return content is clear and there is no plausible denial.
For CalleBTC, a key Bitcoiner developer, complaints about the possibility of registering PIs with Bitcoin are arbitrary. «Suddenly, they care about PI (rare), tomorrow probably for terrorist financing, and next week for the list of OFAC sanctions. They’re losing their course. If you need a safe space, use PayPal,” Calle says.
For him, Bitcoin must be an open economic market and this attribute must be preserved. It’s more important than making a “pseudo-moral” decision.
Elian Huesca, a Mexican bitcoiner interviewed by Cryptootics in the past, has made it clear that the material registrations are registered in Bitcoin’s Unchanging Stone op_return possible without restriction updatebecause there are many ways to store non-financial information in Bitcoin.
«The space within the block is agnostic and natural No permission Bitcoin means that you can store as long as the information is paid for that space,” Huesca believes.
He believes that the argument between “monetarists” and “platforists” is political and not technical. The mediators believe there is a real interest in improving Bitcoin after both sides’ discovered and controversial positions.
Which sector, monetarists and platformists want the best one for Bitcoin, following the philosophical perspective that Bitcoin should be in the future. In reality, this is a political and non-technical argument.
Bitconnor and Elian Huca from Mexico.
Bitconner also considers the arguments explained in this text to be fantastical and false. The true debate revolves around the advancement of Bitcoin Scalability in unpredictable scenarios; Especially the use of Bitcoin paper through ETFs and trades and the Mining Commission.