By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 78,434.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,330.67
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.61
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999165
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 104.08
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 770.71
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999799
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.107701
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.298506
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,331.82
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.282982
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 9.77
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 10.12
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 78,135.00
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 2,870.21
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 1.36
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.178287
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.093016
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 1.15
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000007
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 2,333.39
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 8.57
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 1.54
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 59.86
bitget-token
Bitget Token (BGB) $ 3.09
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 538.84
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 33.21
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.999868
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 3.91
cryptoprune cryptoprune
  • MarketCap
  • Crypto Bubbles
  • Multi Currency
  • Evaluation
  • Home
  • News
  • Crypto
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Cardano
    • Ethereum
    • NFT
    • Solana
  • Market
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Regulation
  • Metaverse
Crypto PruneCrypto Prune
  • Home
  • News
  • Crypto
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Cardano
    • Ethereum
    • NFT
    • Solana
  • Market
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Regulation
  • Metaverse

Search

  • Home
  • News
  • Crypto
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Cardano
    • Ethereum
    • NFT
    • Solana
  • Market
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Regulation
  • Metaverse

Latest Stories

President Trump today unravels the conflict between banks and the crypto industry
President Trump today unravels the conflict between banks and the crypto industry
image
Revolut targets remittances with Peru’s new banking license: report
Epstein files reveal Bitcoin's secret war as Ripple insider exposes 10 years of explosive hidden industry sabotage
Epstein files reveal Bitcoin’s secret war as Ripple insider exposes 10 years of explosive hidden industry sabotage
Bitcoin
ARK reshapes the gold narrative as Bitcoin dips below $80,000
An AI social network that’s not what it seems
An AI social network that’s not what it seems
© 2025 All Rights reserved | Powered by Crypto Prune
Crypto Prune > News > IBM and IONQ advance quantum, but it doesn’t affect Bitcoin
News

IBM and IONQ advance quantum, but it doesn’t affect Bitcoin

8 months ago 5 Min Read

IONQ Technology Company announced its ambitious goals on June 9th. By 2030, it announced that it will build a quantum computer with 2 million physical qubits and 80,000 logical qubits (qubitsin English). A day later, one of the historic pillars of global technology, IBM presented a roadmap for developing “the first large quantum computer and failure resistance” with 200 logical qubits by 2029.

Also, according to IBM’s statement, Quantum Computer can lay the foundations and implement the future quantum blue Jay. 1 billion operations 2,000 logical cubits On the horizon even without a defined date.

These advancements, which were added to what was made by the Oxford University group, were promoted for science, drug elaboration, fundraising or security, but also encourage discussion within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Do these machines represent a threat to network safety?

Experts’ estimates on quantum and bitcoin

X-user known as tech enthusiast Borovik said it will be necessary after the launch of the Willo Roll Willow Quantum chip in December. 13 million to 1.9 billion physical cubits Compromising Bitcoin within a practical period».

Along the same line, but referring to the Bitcoin Mining Base, the SHA-256 algorithm, Cryptootics calculates that 317 million physical qubits are needed to break it.

The relationship between physical and logical qubits is not fixed, but generally accepted criteria take that into account 100-1,000 physical qubits for building logical qubitsdepending on the technology and efficiency of error correction.

This distinction is important. Because most analysts who evaluate the quantum threat of Bitcoin speak from a physical qubit standpoint, IBM and IONQ The logical qubit stands out in its predictionsa conversion is required to compare both scenarios.

See also  Bitcoin Core advocates freedom on the Bitcoin network in a controversial announcement

On his side, Blockstream co-founder Adam Back has approximated “300 million physical qubits” is needed A survey from the University of Sussex also calculated that 13 million physical qubits would be sufficient to decipher Bitcoin encryption in one day. Other reports are consistent with those raised by Sussex.

But Charles Edwards, founder of financial company Capriol, offered a more surprising perspective. In December, he said that “To break the SHA-256 algorithm with Bitcoin, 2,500 logical qubits may be enough.”rebutting higher estimates from other experts.

Edwards added that “error corrections improve exponentially each year,” adding that while the exact deadline is uncertain, there is “a serious risk of 50% of Bitcoin over 5-10 years.” For him, the urgency lies in taking action today to prepare the network before this threat. Following Edwards, scientist Anastasia Marchenkova also points out 2,500 logic qubits.

So is Bitcoin security at risk for Quantum?

To compare these estimates with IBM and IONQ ADS, you need to convert physical qubits to logical qubits.

Using the most optimistic transformation (100 physical qubits per logical qubit), the 13 million physical qubits mentioned by Borovik and the University of Sussex correspond to 130,000 logical qubits, and 300 million bucks are converted to 3 million logical qubits.

These figures are significantly larger than IBM’s 200 logical qubits by 2029 or 80,000 IONQ by 2030, according to these approaches: The danger is still far away.

However, Edwards’ estimated logic qubits of 2,500 are far closer to what IBM is planning to achieve in just four years, suggesting that risks can be realized faster than other analysts have planned.

See also  2026 will be the year Bitcoin takes quantum measures.

Bitcoin-supported encryption based on the ECDSA algorithm (digital signature algorithm for elliptic curves) protects the private key that guarantees the wealth of the funds.

However, quantum computing, which has the ability to solve complex mathematical problems at unattainable speeds of classical computers, is, in theory, I will decrypt this encryption in the future.

Conveniently, the Bitcoin ecosystem is taking steps to face quantum threats. For example, a Chilean developer proposed in April 2025. Hard fork (hard branch) Implement addresses based on secondary perspective encryptionECDSA algorithm replacement.

Bitcoin Libre CEO Ben Sigman said the proposal to improve the BIP-360 will strengthen Bitcoin’s resistance to advances in quantum computing.

TAGGED:Technology
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RELATED NEWS

trump

Post Trump Crypto Benefits: XRP 350%, BTC 58%, ETH 10%, SOL 9%

By Crypto Prune 8 months ago
Bitcoin

Bitcoin Options Market Sees Bullish Shift: Calls Unlocked in the $136k-$145,000 Range

By Crypto Prune 4 months ago
Bitcoin

Bitcoin is better than the best of Wall Street in Iran and Israel – Anist

By Crypto Prune 7 months ago
Binance's first listed Altcoin has announced its buyback program! Prices are rising sharply!

Binance’s first listed Altcoin has announced its buyback program! Prices are rising sharply!

By Crypto Prune 9 months ago
cryptoprune

© 2025 All Rights reserved | Powered by Crypto Prune

  • Altcoins
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Cardano
  • Ethereum
  • Exchange
  • Market
  • Metaverse
  • Mining
  • News
  • Crypto
  • NFT
  • Solana
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?