JP Morgan backlash explodes: Bitcoin supporters urge boycott

6 Min Read
6 Min Read
Editorial you can trust Content is reviewed by leading industry experts and experienced editors. Advertising disclosure

Anger against JPMorgan quickly spread across social platforms this weekend following reports that the bank was involved in policy changes that could hurt companies that hold large amounts of Bitcoin.

According to reports, MSCI (the index firm formerly known as Morgan Stanley Capital International) is likely to tighten its listing rules in January 2026, which will result in companies with more than 50% of their balance sheets held in cryptocurrencies being excluded from major indexes.

This possible action turned the technical indicators issue into a broader public backlash directed at the banks that shared the research memo.

JP Morgan: Anger erupts over index change

The strategy, which joined the Nasdaq 100 in December 2024, benefited from stable passive capital flows associated with index membership.

According to reports, the proposed rules would force companies with high cryptocurrency exposure to either reduce their Bitcoin holdings to below 50% of a threshold or lose the index-driven demand that underpins their stock prices.

Investors and some analysts have warned that either outcome could trigger sharp selling by funds that must follow index rules, which could ripple through to crypto prices.

Celebrity: The Flames vs. JP Morgan

High-profile voices quickly pushed the boycott argument. Real estate investor Grant Cardone said he withdrew $20 million from Chase and threatened legal action over a credit card dispute.

See also  chatgpt-5 sets timeline when Quantum Computers breaks Bitcoin encryption

Media host Max Kaiser targeted JPMorgan and urged his followers to buy Strategy stock and Bitcoin stock instead.

Social posts and online threads amplified those calls, turning technical policy details into a campaign that appeals to what matters to banks: their customers’ money and their public image.

Strategy retracts classification

Strategy executives, led by Michael Saylor, said in a statement that the company does not view itself as a fund or trust that simply holds assets.

The founders described the business as a Bitcoin-backed structured finance company that issues and operates products rather than passively holding investments. This distinction is important because MSCI’s draft standard appears to focus on passive ownership structures.

If MSCI finalizes this change in January 2026, companies with crypto holdings above the threshold would immediately face pressure to change their balance sheets or face delisting from the index, which collects hundreds of millions of dollars in passive flows.

See also  Traders are betting 50-50 odds that Bitcoin will end in 2025 at less than $90,000 as $3 billion ETF goes out

BTCUSD trading at $87,127 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Market risk and next steps

Analysts say the practical effects could be felt quickly. Forced rebalancing by index-tracking funds can lead to concentrated selling in affected stocks.

If multiple treasury companies sell Bitcoin at the same time to meet the new restrictions, the price of the digital asset could fall, adding a second layer of stress.

For now, this rule is reported to be more likely than not final. Market participants are paying close attention to the official announcement and JPMorgan’s public response, but no detailed rebuttal has been provided in response to the growing criticism.

Featured images from Gemini, charts from TradingView

editing process for is focused on providing thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We adhere to strict sourcing standards, and each page is carefully reviewed by our team of top technology experts and experienced editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of your content to your readers.

Share This Article
Leave a comment