The Ethereum Foundation has released a broad update to its financial management strategy, demonstrating a more mature and structured approach to capital allocation to a more mature and structured approach amid growing global influence and growing institutional scrutiny.
The new framework, published on June 4th, outlines how the foundation manages its reserves, deploys capital to defi protocols, and assesses privacy standards while maintaining Ethereum’s ideological commitment to self-power and neutrality.
The policy introduces a formal asset dissolution model that links operational spending to the foundation’s Treasury fixed proportion and multi-year reserve runways.
It also sets detailed guidelines for ETH sales, Stablecoin Holdings, and Chain Deployments, indicating a significant deviation from the Foundation’s historically passive capital stance.
Etherum after competition and ETF
Following the shift to Sport-of-Stake and the approval of the US-registered Ethereum ETF in January 2024, capital inflows and application layer innovations have accelerated.
However, growth has brought new pressures of complexity, volatility and stewardship. The updated framework comes at a pivotal moment for recent concerns in Ethereum and its community.
To manage risk, the foundation employs a double variable financial formula that calculates Fiat Reserve needs by multiplying the fixed annual operating expenses target, currently set at 15%, by a runway of 2.5 years.
This determines the amount of ETH you can safely sell to Fiat or a stable asset. Financial activities have now followed counter-circulation models with more positive support during market slump and bull cycle moderation.
Although Ethereum is the basis of the Treasury Department, new guidelines from EF allow for broader exposure to on-chain opportunities, including staking, lending, tokenized real-world assets, and carefully verified debt protocols.
This shift suggests a more proactive approach to financial management, balancing yield production with ideological and risk constraints.
Privacy as privacy is not your preference
Among the most critical components of policy is a codified commitment to privacy, and the foundation frames “essential civil liberties” in an increasingly monitored financial landscape.
The guidelines reflect the rise of KYC-related apps, a centralized user interface, and growing concerns across the Ethereum community regarding the overreliance of external chain legal protection.
Through a new internal rubric called “Defipunk,” EF evaluates potential Defi partners, including various criteria. Technical privacy features such as unauthorized access, independence, open source licensing, transaction shielding and more.
The missing protocols may still be eligible, but only if they demonstrate reliable progress towards those ideals. This illustrates a rare institutional effort to inject normative standards into decentralized finance. This is an industry that is often driven by incentives rather than ethics.
However, it could conflict with the EF with the US-European regulatory trends, where policymakers increasingly prioritize transparency and compliance over encryption privacy.
Internal operations of EF are subject to these criteria. Staff working on the Ministry of Finance’s deployment are expected to use privacy estimation tools to contribute to open source infrastructure.
